Eric DeVolder wrote: [snip] > I would have thought that for this simple example I'd get identical > results. For reasons I have yet to figure out, the cross compiler is > finding better optimizations than the native, though both are the > same gcc version. I checked the specs files, and the two are identical > other than the "cross_compile" setting. Have you checked (with -v) if the assembler gets the same optimisations in both cases, and/or (with -save-temps) where in the compile things start to diverge? Thiemo
