On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Just make mmiowb() strong enough on those platforms. There's really no > reason to introduce yet another variation at this point. It's just horribly slow and an overkill if it's only ordering of consecutive writes rather than ordering of a read after a write that has to be guaranteed. But perhaps we could keep abusing wmb() for the former... Maciej
