>>>>> On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:31:54 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: anemo> BTW, I wonder if current code (with or without this patch) anemo> works properly for physically indexed cache. Though I do not anemo> know if there were physically indexed icache, there are anemo> certainly physically indexed dcache (ex. MIPS 20KC). anemo> For those physically indexed caches, we should use 'pfn' anemo> argument passed to flush_cache_page ? I'm thinking of introducing MIPS_CACHE_PINDEX and 'cpu_has_pindex_dcache'. I guess secondary cache is also physically indexed. Is there any virtually indexed secondary cache ? --- Atsushi Nemoto
