2006/1/11, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:15:18PM +0100, Ivan Korzakow wrote: > > > Why not simply keep CVS repository available for 1% of people willing > > to browse the history ? And make life easier for 99% of people willing > > to work on 2.6 ... (2.4 work may continue to use CVS too). > > The CVS repository is still available - and will stay for a long time so > people have a chance to do diffs against their existing checked out trees. > But no more changes. > again why not letting 2.2 2.4 stay in CVS ? I don't think there are any active development, isn't it ? Ivan
