On Wed, 2005-12-21 20:00:14 +0100, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:22:08AM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-12-21 17:06:36 +0800, zhuzhenhua <zzh.hust@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > i am not sure which toolchain can work for the 2.6 kernel > > > can you suggest one? > > > > That's a hard question... 2.95.x compilers used to work and were quite > > fast, but newer GCC's features are incorporated into the kernel > > sources so it probably will no longer work. > > There are still users building the kernel with gcc 2.95 and 2.96 > successfully. I guess evolution will get'em all... And that of course depends on how much you take part in it. Only compiling a minimum set of drivers will probably help you out for some time :-> MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
