Hi, Patch basically looks fine but needs some extra work. Detailed comments below... On 10/20/05, David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is the tenth part of my Xilleon port. > > I am sending the full set of patches to linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > which is archived at: http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/ > > Only the patches that touch generic parts of the kernel are coming > here. > > This patch adds the Xilleon's IDE driver. > > Patch against 2.6.14-rc2 from linux-mips.org > > Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Xilleon IDE controller support. > > --- > commit 2a66e82b3d2b02aca88cc2f60286fba0c114139d > tree af6a21de182519250b49d5b127342b969c022174 > parent 162fee1af111103bb6e6275c2e51a550ff393cbc > author David Daney <daney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:59:58 -0700 > committer David Daney <daney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:59:58 -0700 > > drivers/ide/Kconfig | 7 > drivers/ide/pci/Makefile | 1 > drivers/ide/pci/xilleon.c | 637 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 645 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ide/Kconfig b/drivers/ide/Kconfig > --- a/drivers/ide/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/ide/Kconfig > @@ -740,6 +740,13 @@ config BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX > This allows the kernel to change PIO, DMA and UDMA speeds and to > configure the chip to optimum performance. > > +config BLK_DEV_IDE_XILLEON > + bool "Xilleon chipset support" > + depends on ATI_XILLEON > + help > + This driver provides support for the Xilleon's on chip IDE > + controller. > + > endif > > config BLK_DEV_IDE_PMAC > diff --git a/drivers/ide/pci/Makefile b/drivers/ide/pci/Makefile > --- a/drivers/ide/pci/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/Makefile > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SLC90E66) += slc90 > obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TRIFLEX) += triflex.o > obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TRM290) += trm290.o > obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX) += via82cxxx.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_XILLEON) += xilleon.o > > # Must appear at the end of the block > obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_GENERIC) += generic.o > diff --git a/drivers/ide/pci/xilleon.c b/drivers/ide/pci/xilleon.c > new file mode 100644 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/xilleon.c > @@ -0,0 +1,637 @@ > +/* > + * ATI Xilleon 225/226 UDMA controller driver ATI Xilleon 210/225/226 IDE controller driver? > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2001, 2002 Metro Link, Inc. > + * > + * Port to kernel version 2.6.12 by David Daney loosely based on the 2.4.18 > + * version by Metro Link and ATI. Also based on code in via82cxxx.c > + * > + * > + * May be copied or modified under the terms of the GNU General Public License > + * > + */ > + > +#include <linux/config.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/types.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <linux/timer.h> > +#include <linux/mm.h> > +#include <linux/ioport.h> > +#include <linux/blkdev.h> > +#include <linux/hdreg.h> Are the above 6 includes really needed? > +#include <linux/pci.h> > +#include <linux/ide.h> > + > +#include <linux/stat.h> > +#include <linux/proc_fs.h> > + > +#include <asm/mach-xilleon/xilleon.h> > +#include <asm/mach-xilleon/xilleonreg_kernel.h> > +#include <asm/mach-xilleon/xilleonint.h> > + > +#include <asm/io.h> > + > +int xilleon_ide_proc; > + > +static struct pci_dev *bmide_dev; > + > +/* #define DEBUG 1 */ > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS) > +static u8 xilleon_proc = 0; > + > +/** > + * xilleon_ide_get_info - generate xilleon /proc file > + * @buffer: buffer for data > + * @addr: set to start of data to use > + * @offset: current file offset > + * @count: size of read > + * > + * Fills in buffer with the debugging/configuration information for > + * the Xilleon tuning and attached drives > + */ > + > +static int xilleon_ide_get_info(char *buffer, > + char **addr, off_t offset, int count) > +{ > + char *p = buffer; > + u32 bibma = pci_resource_start(bmide_dev, 4); > + struct pci_dev *dev = bmide_dev; > + u8 c0 = 0; > + u8 c1 = 0; > + u8 d0 = 0; > + u8 d1 = 0; > + u8 udma_control; > + > + p += sprintf(p, "\n ATI Xilleon Chipset.\n"); > + > + pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_REVISION_ID, &c1); > + > + p+= sprintf(p, " Revision: %#x\n", c1); > + > + /* > + * at that point bibma+0x2 et bibma+0xa are byte registers > + * to investigate: > + */ > + > + pci_read_config_byte(bmide_dev, pciideIDE_UDMA_CONTROL, &udma_control); > + pci_read_config_byte(bmide_dev, pciideX225_IDE_DMA_MODE + 0, &d0); > + pci_read_config_byte(bmide_dev, pciideX225_IDE_DMA_MODE + 1, &d1); > + > + > + c0 = inb_p((unsigned short)bibma + 0x02); > + c1 = inb_p((unsigned short)bibma + 0x0a); > + > + p += sprintf(p, "--------------- Primary Channel ----------------\n"); > + p += sprintf(p, " %sabled\n", > + (c0&0x80) ? "dis" : " en"); > + > + p += sprintf(p, "--------------- drive0 --------- drive1 --------\n"); > + p += sprintf(p, "DMA enabled: %s %s\n", > + (c0&0x20) ? "yes" : "no ", > + (c0&0x40) ? "yes" : "no "); > + > + p += sprintf(p, "UDMA enabled: %s %s\n", > + (udma_control & 0x01) ? "yes" : "no ", > + (udma_control & 0x02) ? "yes" : "no "); > + > + p += sprintf(p, "Mode: %sDMA %d %sDMA %d\n", > + d0 & 0x10 ? "U" : " ", d0 & 0xf, > + d1 & 0x10 ? "U" : " ", d1 & 0xf); > + > + return p-buffer; /* => must be less than 4k! */ > +} > + > +#endif Please remove /proc interface. Information regarding PCI device and drives are available through another sources (i.e. lspci, hdparm) and (if needed) you can easily write user-space tool for displaying chipset configuration. > +/* > + * initialize the x225 chip > + */ > + > +static unsigned int __devinit pci_init_x225_ide (struct pci_dev *dev, > + const char *name) > +{ > + u32 bmbase = 0; > + > +#ifdef DEBUG > + u8 rev = 0; > + pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_REVISION_ID, &rev); > + printk(KERN_INFO "XILLEON 210/225/226 IDE:" > + " rev %02x IDE UDMA controller on pci%s\n", > + rev, dev->slot_name); > +#endif Data available through lspci, please remove this code. Also when it comes to debug messages please define macro which will be defined only for #ifdef DEBUG so we can get rid of #ifdef/#endif ugliness, i.e.: #ifdef DEBUG #define xilleon_dbg(format, args...) printk(KERN_DEBUG format, args) #else #define xilleon_dbg(format, args...) #endif Please also use __FUNCTION__ macro instead of function name directly. > + bmide_dev = dev; > + > + /* Indicate drives are capable of dma transfers */ > + pci_read_config_dword(bmide_dev, pciideX225_IDE_BM_BASE, &bmbase); > + bmbase &= 0xfffffff0; > + outb((inb(bmbase + ioideX225_IDE_PRI_BM_STATUS) | 0x60), > + bmbase + ioideX225_IDE_PRI_BM_STATUS); > + outb((inb(bmbase + ioideX225_IDE_SEC_BM_STATUS) | 0x60), > + bmbase + ioideX225_IDE_SEC_BM_STATUS); This is wrong place to do this. Moreover this should be already handled by hwif->ide_dma_host_on(). In case of this driver __ide_dma_host_on() seems sufficient? > + return 0; > +} > + > +/******************************************************** > +* > +* max_drive_pio_mode > +* > +* Determine the maximum pio mode supported by this drive > +* > +*********************************************************/ > +static byte max_drive_pio_mode (ide_drive_t *drive) > +{ > + unsigned short pio_timing[6] = {960, 480, 240, 180, 120, 90}; > + unsigned short adv_modes = drive->id->eide_pio_modes; > + unsigned short iordy_time = drive->id->eide_pio_iordy; > + byte mode_mask = 0x01; > + byte max_pio = 2; > + > + if (drive->id->field_valid & 0x02) { > + /* If the drive supports flow control, use the minimum > + * iordy time to find the best pio mode supported by > + * the drive. */ > + if (drive->id->eide_pio_iordy > 0) { > + /* iordy supported, use minimum drive timing to > + find best mode. */ > + for (max_pio = 5; > + max_pio && iordy_time > pio_timing[max_pio]; > + max_pio--); > + } else { > + /* iordy not supported, use advanced mode support > + flags to find best mode. */ > + for (max_pio = 2; > + adv_modes & mode_mask; mode_mask <<= 1) { > + max_pio++; > + } > + } > + } > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("XILLEON 210/225/226 IDE drive %d, max pio mode = %d\n", > + drive->dn, max_pio); > +#endif > + return max_pio; > +} max_drive_pio_mode() shares a lot of code with drivers/ide/pci/serverworks.c:config_chipset_for_pio() except that it doesn't handle PIO SLOW/0/1 modes and wrongly assumes PIO 2 to be minimum mode supported by a device. Please try to find a way to share code with serverworks.c (moving to ide-lib.c) and fix "PIO2" assumption. > +/******************************************************** > +* > +* max_drive_dma_mode > +* > +* Determine the maximum dma mode supported by this drive > +* > +*********************************************************/ > +static byte max_drive_dma_mode (ide_drive_t *drive) > +{ > + unsigned short dma_modes = drive->id->dma_mword; > + unsigned short mode_mask = 0x80; > + byte max_dma = 0; > + > + if (drive->id->field_valid & 0x02 && dma_modes & 0xff) { > + for (max_dma = 7; > + (dma_modes & mode_mask) == 0; mode_mask >>= 1) { > + max_dma--; > + } > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("XILLEON 210/225/226 IDE drive %d," > + " max dma mode = %d\n", drive->dn, max_dma); > +#endif > + return max_dma; > + } else { > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("XILLEON 210/225/226 IDE drive %d," > + " dma not supported\n", drive->dn); > +#endif > + return 0x0f; > + } > +} > + > +/******************************************************** > +* > +* max_drive_udma_mode > +* > +* Determine the maximum dma mode supported by this drive > +* > +*********************************************************/ > +static byte max_drive_udma_mode (ide_drive_t *drive) > +{ > + unsigned short udma_modes = drive->id->dma_ultra; > + unsigned short mode_mask = 0x80; > + byte max_udma = 0; > + > + if (drive->id->field_valid & 0x04 && udma_modes & 0xff) { > + for (max_udma = 7; > + (udma_modes & mode_mask) == 0; mode_mask >>= 1) { > + max_udma--; > + } > + if (eighty_ninty_three(drive)) { > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("XILLEON 210/225/226 IDE drive %d," > + " max udma mode = %d\n", drive->dn, max_udma); > +#endif > + return max_udma; > + } else { > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("XILLEON 210/225/226 IDE IDE cable does not" > + " support UDMA modes > 2." > + " Drive %d, max udma mode = %d\n", > + drive->dn, max_udma > 2 ? 2 : max_udma); > +#endif > + return max_udma > 2 ? 2 : max_udma; > + } > + } else { > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("XILLEON 210/225/226 IDE drive %d," > + " udma not supported\n", drive->dn); > +#endif > + return 0x0f; > + } > +} > + > + > +static int x225_ide_tune_chipset (ide_drive_t *drive, byte speed) xilleon_ide_tune_chipset? Please don't use 'byte' type, 'u8' is fine. > +{ > + > + ide_hwif_t *hwif = HWIF(drive); drive->hwif; > + struct pci_dev *dev = hwif->pci_dev; > + int err; > + > + u32 work_dword; > + > + u8 tmg_cntl_reg_off; /* timing register offset */ > + u8 pio_cntl_reg_off; /* pio control register offset */ > + u8 pio_mode_reg_off; /* pio mode register offset */ > + u8 pio_mode_reg; /* pio mode register contents */ > + u8 pio_mode; /* pio mode */ > +#if 0 > + u8 pio_control; /* pio control register */ > +#endif > + u8 dma_mode_reg_off; /* dma mode register offset */ > + u8 dma_mode; /* dma mode */ > + > + if (drive->dn > 3) /* we support four drives */ > + return -1; IDE layer will never assign drive->dn > 3 so this check should go away. > + /* Setup register offsets for current drive */ > + /* Assume drives 0/1 are on primary, 2/3 are on secondary */ > + if (drive->dn > 1) { > + pio_mode_reg_off = pciideX225_IDE_PIO_MODE+1; > + pio_cntl_reg_off = pciideX225_IDE_PIO_CONTROL+1; > + tmg_cntl_reg_off = drive->dn&1 ? > + pciideX225_IDE_TMG_CNTL+2 : pciideX225_IDE_TMG_CNTL+3; > + dma_mode_reg_off = drive->dn&1 ? > + pciideX225_IDE_DMA_MODE+3 : pciideX225_IDE_DMA_MODE+2; > + } else { > + pio_mode_reg_off = pciideX225_IDE_PIO_MODE; > + pio_cntl_reg_off = pciideX225_IDE_PIO_CONTROL; > + tmg_cntl_reg_off = drive->dn&1 ? > + pciideX225_IDE_TMG_CNTL : pciideX225_IDE_TMG_CNTL+1; > + dma_mode_reg_off = drive->dn&1 ? > + pciideX225_IDE_DMA_MODE+1 : pciideX225_IDE_DMA_MODE; > + } Please rewrite above code to be more readable, i.e.: pio_mode_reg_off = pciideX225_IDE_PIO_MODE + (drive->dn > 1) ? 1 : 0; pio_cntl_reg_off = pciideX225_IDE_PIO_CONTROL + (drive->dn > 1) ? 1 : 0; tmg_cntl_reg_off = pciideX225_IDE_TMG_CNTL + drive->dn; dma_mode_reg_off = pciideX225_IDE_DMA_MODE + drive->dn; > + /* Reset auto-calc override so that controller calculates mode > + timing. */ > + pci_write_config_byte(dev, tmg_cntl_reg_off, 0x7f); > + > + /* All three transfer types require pio mode to be set to */ > + /* maximum mode supported by both the drive and controller */ > + /* Get the current contents and clear the mode field for this drive*/ > + pci_read_config_byte(dev, pio_mode_reg_off, &pio_mode_reg); > + pio_mode_reg = drive->dn&1 ? pio_mode_reg & 0x07 : pio_mode_reg & 0x70; > + /* Get the highest mode the drive can support */ > + pio_mode = max_drive_pio_mode(drive); > + > +#if 0 > + /* All three transfer types require udma control to be set/reset */ > + /* according to the transfer mode to be used */ > + /* Get the current contents and clear the enable flag for this drive*/ > + pci_read_config_byte(dev, pciideIDE_UDMA_CONTROL, &udma_control_reg); > + udma_control_reg = drive->dn ? > + udma_control_reg & 0xfd : pio_mode_reg & 0xfe; > +#endif Why is the above code disabled? Either enable or remove it. > + switch(speed) { > + case XFER_PIO_4: > + case XFER_PIO_3: > + case XFER_PIO_2: > + case XFER_PIO_1: > + case XFER_PIO_0: > + /* Setting transfer mode to PIO */ > + /* If requested mode is higher than drive supports, > + set to highest supported */ > + pio_mode = pio_mode > (speed - XFER_PIO_0) ? > + speed - XFER_PIO_0 : pio_mode; This should be left up to the upper layers. > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("xilleon_ide_tune_chipset for drive %s (%d)," > + " pio mode %d\n", drive->name, drive->dn, pio_mode); > +#endif > + > +#if 0 > + /* Enable prefetch and write posting */ > + pci_read_config_byte(dev, pio_cntl_reg_off, &pio_control); > + pio_control = drive->dn ? > + pio_control | 0x50 : pio_control | 0xa0; > + pci_write_config_byte(dev, pio_cntl_reg_off, pio_control); > +#endif Why is the above code disabled? Either enable or remove it. > + break; > + > + case XFER_MW_DMA_2: > + case XFER_MW_DMA_1: > + case XFER_MW_DMA_0: > + /* Setting transfer mode to Multiword DMA */ > + dma_mode = speed - XFER_MW_DMA_0; > + pci_write_config_byte(dev, dma_mode_reg_off, dma_mode); > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("xilleon_ide_tune_chipset for drive %s (%d)," > + " dma mode %d, pio mode %d\n", > + drive->name, drive->dn, dma_mode, pio_mode); > +#endif > + break; > + > + case XFER_UDMA_5: > + case XFER_UDMA_4: > + case XFER_UDMA_3: > + case XFER_UDMA_2: > + case XFER_UDMA_1: > + case XFER_UDMA_0: > + /* Setting transfer mode to Ultra DMA */ > + dma_mode = (speed - XFER_UDMA_0)|0x10; > + pci_write_config_byte(dev, dma_mode_reg_off, dma_mode); > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("xilleon_ide_tune_chipset for drive %s (%d)," > + " udma mode %d, pio mode %d\n", > + drive->name, drive->dn, (speed - XFER_UDMA_0), > + pio_mode); > +#endif > + default: This case should return error (-1). > + break; > + } > + > + if (!drive->init_speed) > + drive->init_speed = speed; This is wrong place to do it and ide_config_drive_speed() does it anyway on success. > + /* Set Read and Write Combining */ > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, pciideX225_IDE_PCI_BUSMASTER_CNTL, > + &work_dword); > + pci_write_config_dword(dev, pciideX225_IDE_PCI_BUSMASTER_CNTL, > + work_dword|0x60); > + > + pio_mode_reg |= drive->dn&1 ? pio_mode << 4 : pio_mode; > + pci_write_config_byte(dev, pio_mode_reg_off, pio_mode_reg); > + err = ide_config_drive_speed(drive, speed); > + drive->current_speed = speed; ditto > +#if 0 > + pci_read_config_word(dev, pciideIDE_DEVICE_ID, &work_word); > + printk("IDE_DEVICE_ID = %04x\n", work_word); > + > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, pciideIDE_TMG_CNTL, &work_dword); > + printk("IDE_TMG_CNTL = %08x\n", work_dword); > + > + pci_read_config_word(dev, pciideIDE_PIO_CONTROL, &work_word); > + printk("IDE_PIO_CONTROL = %04x\n", work_word); > + > + pci_read_config_word(dev, pciideIDE_PIO_MODE, &work_word); > + printk("IDE_PIO_MODE = %04x\n", work_word); > + > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, pciideIDE_DMA_MODE, &work_dword); > + printk("IDE_DMA_MODE = %08x\n", work_dword); > + > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, pciideIDE_PCI_BUSMASTER_CNTL, &work_dword); > + printk("IDE_PCI_BUSMASTER_CNTL = %08x\n", work_dword); > +#endif Please move debugging code to separate function or remove it. > + return err; > +} > + > +/************************************ > + > +config_chipset_for_pio > + > +Set the controller and drive to the > +highest pio mode supported by both > + > +*************************************/ > + > +static void config_chipset_for_pio (ide_drive_t *drive) > +{ > + byte speed = XFER_PIO_0 + max_drive_pio_mode (drive); u8 speed > + (void) x225_ide_tune_chipset(drive, speed); > + > + drive->current_speed = speed; Redundant, see comment for x225_ide_tune_chipset(). > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("config_chipset_for_pio, speed is %d \n", speed); > +#endif > +} > + > +static void x225_ide_tune_drive (ide_drive_t *drive, byte pio) u8 pio > +{ > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("tune drive %s (%d) for pio %d\n", drive->name, drive->dn, pio); > +#endif > + (void) x225_ide_tune_chipset(drive, XFER_PIO_0 + pio); ->tuneproc needs to handle pio == 255 argument which means autotune. > +} > + > +static int config_chipset_for_dma (ide_drive_t *drive) > +{ > + struct hd_driveid *id = drive->id; > + byte speed = 0x0f; u8 speed > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("config_chipset_for_dma for drive %s (%d)\n", > + drive->name, drive->dn); > +#endif > + > + /* Check if drive supports ultra dma - get highest supported mode */ > + if ((speed = max_drive_udma_mode (drive)) != 0x0f) { > + speed = speed > 5 ? 5 + XFER_UDMA_0 : speed + XFER_UDMA_0; > + /* Check if drive supports dma - get highest supported mode */ > + } else if ((speed = max_drive_dma_mode (drive)) != 0x0f) { > + speed = speed > 2 ? 2 + XFER_MW_DMA_0 : speed + XFER_MW_DMA_0; > + } max_drive_udma_mode() and max_drive_dma_mode() duplicates functionality available in IDE core so please remove them and use ide_use_dma() + ide_dma_speed(). [ please remember to set correct values of hwif->ultra_mask, hwif->mwdma_mask and hwif->atapi_dma in ide_init_x225() ] > + if(speed == 0x0f) { > + /* Speed not set yet, get max pio mode supported > + by the drive. */ > + speed = max_drive_pio_mode (drive); > + speed = speed > 4 ? 4 + XFER_PIO_0 : speed + XFER_PIO_0; > + } You should do x225_ide_tune_drive(drive, 255) instead. > + (void) x225_ide_tune_chipset(drive, speed); > + > + /* Set return code based on drive id information. */ > + return (((id->dma_ultra & 0xff00 && id->field_valid & 0x04) || > + (id->dma_mword & 0xff00 && id->field_valid & 0x02)) ? 1 : 0); You should use return value of x225_ide_tune_chipset() instead. > +} > + > +static int config_drive_xfer_rate (ide_drive_t *drive) > +{ > + struct hd_driveid *id = drive->id; > + int use_dma = 1; > + ide_hwif_t *hwif = HWIF(drive); drive->hwif; > +#ifdef DEBUG > + printk("config_drive_xfer_rate for drive %s (%d)\n", > + drive->name, drive->dn); > +#endif > + > + if (id && (id->capability & 1) && HWIF(drive)->autodma) { (id->capability & 1) && hwif->autodma [ id should always exist ] > + /* Consult the list of known "bad" drives */ > + if (__ide_dma_bad_drive (drive)) > + use_dma = 0; > + /* Not in list of bad drives - check udma */ > + else if (id->field_valid & 0x06) > + /* Try to config ultra dma or multiword dma */ > + use_dma = config_chipset_for_dma(drive); Please use ide_use_dma(). > + if (use_dma) > + config_chipset_for_pio(drive); > + > + } > + > + return use_dma ? > + hwif->ide_dma_on(drive) : hwif->ide_dma_off_quietly(drive); > +} > + > +static void ide_outbsync_x22x (ide_drive_t *drive, u8 addr, > + unsigned long port) > +{ > + outb(addr, port); > + wmb(); > +} > + > +/* > + * Init the hwif structure for this controller > + */ > +static void __devinit ide_init_x225 (ide_hwif_t *hwif) xilleon_ide_init? > +{ > + if (!hwif->irq) { > +#ifdef CONFIG_XILLEON_IDE_SEC I can't find this config option anywhere in the whole patchset. > + hwif->irq = X225_IDE_INT_SEC; > +#else > + hwif->irq = X225_IDE_INT; > +#endif > + } > + hwif->tuneproc = x225_ide_tune_drive; > + hwif->speedproc = x225_ide_tune_chipset; > + hwif->serialized = 1; Why is this needed? As this seems to be single channel controller this flag is completely irrelevant. > + hwif->OUTBSYNC = ide_outbsync_x22x; > + > + > + if (hwif->dma_base) { > + if (!noautodma) > + hwif->autodma = 1; > + hwif->ide_dma_check = config_drive_xfer_rate; > + hwif->udma_four = 1; Cable detection code is missing. > + } else { > + hwif->autodma = 0; > + hwif->drives[0].autotune = 1; > + hwif->drives[1].autotune = 1; > + } > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS) > + if (!xilleon_proc) { > + ide_pci_create_host_proc("xilleon", xilleon_ide_get_info); > + xilleon_proc = 1; > + } > +#endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ > + return; > +} > + > +static void __devinit ide_dmacapable_x22x(ide_hwif_t *hwif, > + unsigned long dmabase) > +{ > + hwif->dma_base = dmabase; This is wrong thing to do here. hwif->dma_base is assigned after successful allocation of I/O region in ide_iomio_dma(). [ ide_setup_dma()->ide_dma_iobase()->ide_iomio_dma() ] > + ide_setup_dma(hwif, dmabase, 8); > +} After removing hwif->dma_base assignment ide_dmacapable_x22x() becomes unnecessary and should be removed. > +static int __devinit init_setup_x22x (struct pci_dev *dev, > + ide_pci_device_t *d) > +{ > + return ide_setup_pci_device(dev, d); > +} Unused and not needed. > +static ide_pci_device_t xilleon_chipsets[] __devinitdata = { > + { /* 0 */ > + .name = "X225", > + .init_setup = init_setup_x22x, > + .init_chipset = pci_init_x225_ide, > + .init_iops = NULL, > + .init_hwif = ide_init_x225, > + .init_dma = ide_dmacapable_x22x, > + .channels = 1, > + .autodma = AUTODMA, > + .enablebits = {{0x00,0x00,0x00}, {0x00,0x00,0x00}}, > + .bootable = ON_BOARD, > + .extra = 0, > + },{ /* 1 */ > + .name = "X226", > + .init_setup = init_setup_x22x, > + .init_chipset = pci_init_x225_ide, > + .init_iops = NULL, > + .init_hwif = ide_init_x225, > + .init_dma = ide_dmacapable_x22x, > + .channels = 1, > + .autodma = AUTODMA, > + .enablebits = {{0x00,0x00,0x00}, {0x00,0x00,0x00}}, > + .bootable = ON_BOARD, > + .extra = 0, > + },{ /* 2 */ > + .name = "X210", > + .init_setup = init_setup_x22x, > + .init_chipset = pci_init_x225_ide, > + .init_iops = NULL, > + .init_hwif = ide_init_x225, > + .init_dma = ide_dmacapable_x22x, > + .channels = 1, > + .autodma = AUTODMA, > + .enablebits = {{0x00,0x00,0x00}, {0x00,0x00,0x00}}, > + .bootable = ON_BOARD, > + .extra = 0, > + } > +}; xilleon_chipsets[] entries for X210/X225/X226 are identical except .name. What about just using "Xilleon" as a name and removing duplicate entries? > +static struct pci_device_id xilleon_pci_tbl[] __devinitdata = { > + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_X225_IDE, > + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, > + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_X226_IDE, > + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 1}, > + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_X210_IDE, > + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 2}, > + { 0, }, > +}; > + > + > +static int __devinit xilleon_init_one(struct pci_dev *dev, > + const struct pci_device_id *id) > +{ > + ide_pci_device_t *d = &xilleon_chipsets[id->driver_data]; > + return ide_setup_pci_device(dev, d); > +} > + > +static struct pci_driver driver = { xilleon_ide_driver? > + .name = "xilleon_ide", > + .id_table = xilleon_pci_tbl, > + .probe = xilleon_init_one, > +}; > + > + > +static int xilleon_ide_init(void) __init tag is missing. > +{ > + return ide_pci_register_driver(&driver); > +} > + > +static void xilleon_ide_exit(void) > +{ > + ide_pci_unregister_driver(&driver); > +} > + > +module_init(xilleon_ide_init); > +module_exit(xilleon_ide_exit); Removal of IDE chipset modules is unsafe and not supported. Please remove xilleon_ide_exit() until IDE core is fixed. > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PCI driver module for Xilleon IDE"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); Please try to use DocBook style for function comments. You may also need to run lindent on this driver as in few places it contains spaces instead of tabs and whitespaces at the end of the line. Thanks, Bartlomiej
