Re: RFC: Revise n32 ptrace interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:26:01PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> 1.  We need to get at the 64-bit registers.  I considered a number of
> different approaches for this and decided to just implement a 64-bit
> PTRACE_GETREGS instead of messing with PTRACE_PEEKUSR.  It's much simpler
> this way.  I didn't add one for the DSP registers; that can be handled
> separately when someone's working on debug support for them...

I quite deliberately did omit DSP support from 64-bit ptrace(2); there
is currently no MIPS64 processor with DSP support that I know of.

  Ralf


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux