Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-13 07:15:03 -0500, sjhill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <sjhill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > As a heads up, I've started playing with GIT as the replacement of CVS. > > > For information on the status of that conversion please see > > > > > I assume the reason for choosing GIT was because the main line kernel > > uses the same source management tool. No chance of using Subversion I > > guess. > > Is SVN already distributed? In the past, the non-distributed reality > of CVS is what bought me a lot of trouble. And SVN isn't really > designed for distribution, is it? SVN isn't, but SVK (which uses regular SVN) is. > I for one see SVN as a CVS rewrite with some design flaws fixed, but > it's for sure not what I actually want to use. > > So I'm currently learning to use GIT. It's a bit strange when you > start using it (because usually I interact with git itself as well as > with eg. cogito), but I slowly get used to it :-) I think for kernel development git is the way to go. Thiemo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
