On Tue, 2005-09-13 07:15:03 -0500, sjhill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <sjhill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As a heads up, I've started playing with GIT as the replacement of CVS. > > For information on the status of that conversion please see > > > I assume the reason for choosing GIT was because the main line kernel > uses the same source management tool. No chance of using Subversion I > guess. Is SVN already distributed? In the past, the non-distributed reality of CVS is what bought me a lot of trouble. And SVN isn't really designed for distribution, is it? I for one see SVN as a CVS rewrite with some design flaws fixed, but it's for sure not what I actually want to use. So I'm currently learning to use GIT. It's a bit strange when you start using it (because usually I interact with git itself as well as with eg. cogito), but I slowly get used to it :-) MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
