On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Manish Lachwani wrote: > > > Why is this approach (in the patch) bad? [...] > > It's fragile because clock frequencies are changing faster in today's > > world of electronics than the weather in April. [...] > So? Can you be a little more clear? Oh well, how can you assure a given binary will be booted on a CPU driven by the right frequency? Is the clock source inside the chip containing the CPU at least? Maciej
