On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 12:39:42PM -0800, Manish Lachwani wrote: > Why is this approach (in the patch) bad? It's fragile because clock frequencies are changing faster in today's world of electronics than the weather in April. Ralf
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 12:39:42PM -0800, Manish Lachwani wrote: > Why is this approach (in the patch) bad? It's fragile because clock frequencies are changing faster in today's world of electronics than the weather in April. Ralf