On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 15:46 +0100, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > > so this means, the mtd subsystem should use them and that the patch > > below is the way to fix it? (hoping it won't brake on other systems?) > > sorry, wrong patch... the patch below should have s/__raw_/bus_/g > instead of s/__raw_//g; Probably, although <linux/mtd/map.h> seems device-independent and that may mean you might want to take the endianness of the bus an MTD is connected to, to preserve data consistency when moving the MTD between systems of different endiannesses (it may be non-volatile memory of some sort). > anyway, are the bus_# memory accessors defined for all archs at all? Not at all, I'm afraid, and fixing that might be a good idea. Unfortunately most platforms use a single endianness only and therefore have a biased view on these accessory functions. Especially little-endian folks may have troubles understanding what's this all about. Maciej
