On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 02:21:46PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 07:48:15AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > Would this include abstracting the notion of KSEG1/CKSEG1 into something > > where one name would get the right var on 32 or 64 ? If so, is this in > > CVS now? If not, wouldn't it make sense to put this in now and convert > > it when the changes do go in? > > The plan was to use K0BASE / K1BASE and define them as appropriate for > a platform. KSEG0 / KSEG1 / KSEG2 would always be 32-bit constants and > CKSEG0/1/2 always 64-bit. Somebody recently screwed the latter with a > checkin. Ah, that makes sense. I'll wait for it to show up in HEAD. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
