No. atomic_lock is intentionally undefined, so this patch seems very broken.
if i don't change it to static it won't compile correctly. so obviously i don't get something.
it seems that the bcm1250 needs atomic_lock to be defined for the fall through case for smp. either that or i need to figure out how to write the assemble code for the SB1 case...
what do you think needs to be done?
peter
