On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 08:51:20PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > int TARGET_SHIFT_TRUNCATION_MASK (enum machine_mode MODE) ... > Note that, unlike `SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED', this function does > _not_ apply to general shift rtxes; it applies only to instructions > that are generated by the named shift patterns. I'm not particularly thrilled about this notion. I'd much prefer a target hook that could replace SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED. How often are the named patterns going to differ from the rtxes anyway? r~
