Richard Henderson <rth@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:01:43PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (cmp1, cmp2, cmp_code, true, op1_mode, >> + 0, 0, subword_label); >> + >> + if (!expand_superword_shift (op1_mode, binoptab, >> + outof_input, op1, >> + outof_target, into_target, >> + unsignedp, methods)) >> + return false; > > Return without cleaning up the branch emitted? In particular, > doing so without emitting the labels will result in ICEs. The whole thing's in a sequence that gets discarded if expand_doubleword_shift returns false. Isn't that enough? Richad
