On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Oops! Serves me right for dabbling in new code. Only the first > hunk is correct. Thanks Richard for working on this. I've verified your patch on my system and as it is obviously correct, I've applied it with a trivial formatting change to our CVS, both to the head and to the 2.4 branch; with appropriate literal name changes for the latter. Maciej
