Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote... >> Does the patch below (against 2.6) fix things? Only the first hunk >> is needed to fix the bug, the rest is just there for consistency. > Oops! Serves me right for dabbling in new code. Only the first > hunk is correct. Yup, that does it! Many thanks. The only thing I had to change for 2.4.x was the name of the "fcr31" soft-struct member; it's "sr" in older kernels: > + if (((ctx->fcr31 & cond) != 0) == ((MIPSInst_RT(ir) & 1) != 0)) ^^^^^ sr > + xcp->regs[MIPSInst_RD(ir)] = xcp->regs[MIPSInst_RS(ir)]; (Ralf renamed things on 20030720, according to the cvsweb.) Thanks again, -- Greg Roelofs `Name an animal that's small and fuzzy.' `Mold.' Philips Semiconductors greg.roelofs@xxxxxxxxxxx
