Re: Optimisation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Sridhar Adagada wrote:
> As you can see $6 is the length, my confusion is at the lines 12-14,
> 19, 20 why is the length added with 65535 and the comparison with 0

It's not `added with 65535', but `ANDed with 65535'. MIPS32 has 32-bit integer
operations only. If you want to do 16-bit math, all data has to be masked.

Anyway, for performance, it's better to do 32-bit math only.

> short cal_xxx(short *abs, short *coef, short len, short base)
> {
>  short i;
>  short sum = 0;
>
>  for (i = 0; i < length; i++)
>  {
>    sum += ( (unsigned int)abs[i] * (unsigned int)coef[i] );

Why cast to unsigned int while sum is a short? Unless you really want to rely
on sum being a short, you better make it int and do the truncation to short
after the loop.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux