"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Or should we get rid of the 20-bit "break" completely? The two-argument > version provides the same functionality, although the 10-bit codes to be > used do not map to the 20-bit equivalent "optically" very well. > Especially if decimal notation is used. I notice no-one's really responded to this question yet. FWIW, on gut instinct, I'd personally prefer to drop the 20-bit break than introduce a new, non-standard name for it. Just an opinion though. I won't argue against anyone saying different. ;) Richard
