Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, David Daney wrote:

> Just out of curiosity, do you propose this patch in lieu of the patch to 
> Linux's traps.c?
> 
> Or would you do both?

 Both.

> It seems like both would be best, as there are already "broken" binutils 
> floating around out there.

 And broken binaries.

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, PGP key available        +


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux