Re: locking problems with mips atomicity ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:44:34AM +0200, Harm Verhagen wrote:
> The code from linux 2.4.26 arch-mips/atomic.h looks _very_ similar to
> the code described in the thread that has a BUG.
> 
> static __inline__ void atomic_add(int i, atomic_t * v)
> {
> 	unsigned long temp;
> 
> 	__asm__ __volatile__(
> 		"1:   ll      %0, %1      # atomic_add\n"
> 		"     addu    %0, %2                  \n"
> 		"     sc      %0, %1                  \n"
> 		"     beqz    %0, 1b                  \n"
> 		: "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
> 		: "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
> }
> 
> So I wonder if there is a bug here. 
> Can some MIPS guru check ? :)

It won't be a problem in the kernel.  The problem only happens when the
assembler expands a macro to multiple instructions including a load,
and that only happens for position-independent code; the kernel is not
PIC.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux