On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jun Sun wrote: > I am completely lost in your arguments. Let us keep it to the basic. > > Tell me what is wrong with the following, and why your proposal > is better than this: > > 1) get rid of calibrate_*() function > 2) introduce a generic counter frequence calibration routine, which > is only invoked when mips_counter_frequency is 0. > 3) If any board is not happy with this calibration, it is free to > do its calibration in board_timer_init(), which would set > mips_counter_frequency to be non-zero. So I am lost, too. What I proposed with the patch is exactly what you describe above. So what's wrong with it? -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
