On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 06:49:08PM -0700, Pete Popov wrote: > Looks like the latest udelay in 2.4 is borked. Anyway else notice that > problem? I did a 10 sec test: mdelay works, udelay is broken, at least > for the CPU and toolchain I'm using. That just doesn't make sense. Mdelay is based on udelay so if udelay is broken mdelay should be broken, too. Ralf
