On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 02:12:07PM +0200, Kevin D. Kissell wrote: > > Any justifiable reason for getting rid of arch/mips64? > > In my opinion, it should never have existed. The vast majority > of MIPS-specific kernel code can be identical for 32-bit and 64-bit > versions of the architecture. Creating arch/mips64 (as opposed > to arch/mips/mips64 or Ralf's arch/mips/mm-64) caused duplication > of modules that then needed to be maintained in parallel - but which > often were not. In retroperspective it was a good think to start with and allowed us to do some of the really intrusive change necessary without disturbing the 32-bit stuff. Now that things are settling down it's time to cleanup. Ralf
