> Any justifiable reason for getting rid of arch/mips64? In my opinion, it should never have existed. The vast majority of MIPS-specific kernel code can be identical for 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the architecture. Creating arch/mips64 (as opposed to arch/mips/mips64 or Ralf's arch/mips/mm-64) caused duplication of modules that then needed to be maintained in parallel - but which often were not.
