On Fri, 23 May 2003, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 23 May 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > @@ -145,8 +146,6 @@
> > * but the BD bit in the cause register is not set.
> > */
> > case bcond_op:
> > - case j_op:
> > - case jal_op:
> > case beq_op:
> > case bne_op:
> > case blez_op:
> > @@ -155,7 +154,11 @@
> > case bnel_op:
> > case blezl_op:
> > case bgtzl_op:
> > - case jalx_op:
> > + if (branch) {
> > + /* branch in a branch delay slot */
> > + goto sigill;
> > + }
> > + branch = 1;
> > pc += 4;
> > goto retry;
>
> Hmm, what tree is it against? I can't see code matching these hunks in
> our tree at linux-mips.org.
Check out the 2.4.x branch. I did verify that all patches apply.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
