RE: Improperly handled case in arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Umm... I might have some time in a few weeks.  Right now it's not much
of a priority for us (as a corporation).  I just have to hijack the
code from some of our other boards which already implements the new
system.

Matt

--
Matthew D. Dharm                            Senior Software Designer
Momentum Computer Inc.                      1815 Aston Ave.  Suite 107
(760) 431-8663 X-115                        Carlsbad, CA 92008-7310
Momentum Works For You                      www.momenco.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralf Baechle [mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 4:07 PM
> To: Jun Sun
> Cc: Jeff Baitis; Pete Popov; linux-mips@linux-mips.org;
> Matthew Dharm
> Subject: Re: Improperly handled case in
> arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:56:25PM -0700, Jun Sun wrote:
>
> > I think this is a good example to show benefit of code sharing.
> > There is no good reason for au1x00 boards of not using new time.c.
> > You get to write less board code, fewer bugs and future proof.
>
> There are just three configurations left using CONFIG_OLD_TIME_C:
>
>  - EV64120 which I guess can be considered abandonded
>  - Momenco Ocelot (Matthew, feel like you have time to take care of
>    this?)
>  - RM200  (semi-maintained, my turn to fix it ...)
>
> Seems like it's time to get rid of CONFIG_OLD_TIME_C.
>
>   Ralf
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux