>>>>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 17:48:25 +0200, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> said: >> One more request. Please enclose R4600_V1_HIT_CACHEOP_WAR and >> R4600_V2_HIT_CACHEOP_WAR with appropriate CONFIG_CPU_XXX. I do not >> know what CPUs need this workaround... (at least TX49 does not need >> this) ralf> I'll leave it unconditionally enabled for now because the ralf> Makefiles could behave in undefined ways if multiple ralf> CONFIG_CPU_* options are selected and quite a few systems ralf> support both the R4600 and other processors like the Indy. ralf> Another day. I have been misunderstood that people who needs the workaround always select CONFIG_CPU_R4X00. But it is not true. Now I understand. But recent reorganization increased a number of c-r4k.c users somewhat. How about introducing new config macros such as CONFIG_R4600_V1_WORKAROUNDS ? --- Atsushi Nemoto