Re: [PATCH 2.5] r4k_switch task_struct/thread_info fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Actually the following hunks are not right.  ST_OFF
should be applied against the task_struct, which is a0,
not thread_info (t3).  Try to back off the change and see if things
are ok.

Also see my next email before you rush into trying :-)

Jun


On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:21:50PM +0100, Vivien Chappelier wrote:
<snip>
>  	/*
>  	 * clear saved user stack CU1 bit
>  	 */
> -	ld	t0, ST_OFF(a0)
> +	ld	t0, ST_OFF(t3)
>  	li	t1, ~ST0_CU1
>  	and	t0, t0, t1
> -	sd	t0, ST_OFF(a0)
> +	sd	t0, ST_OFF(t3)
>  
>  	
>  	sll	t2, t0, 5
> Index: arch/mips/kernel/r4k_switch.S
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/kernel/r4k_switch.S,v
> retrieving revision 1.29
> diff -u -r1.29 r4k_switch.S
> --- arch/mips/kernel/r4k_switch.S	5 Nov 2002 19:51:47 -0000	1.29
> +++ arch/mips/kernel/r4k_switch.S	3 Feb 2003 22:06:17 -0000
> @@ -67,10 +67,10 @@
>  	/*
>  	 * clear saved user stack CU1 bit
>  	 */
> -	lw	t0, ST_OFF(a0)
> +	lw	t0, ST_OFF(t3)
>  	li	t1, ~ST0_CU1
>  	and	t0, t0, t1
> -	sw	t0, ST_OFF(a0)
> +	sw	t0, ST_OFF(t3)
>  
>  	FPU_SAVE_DOUBLE(a0, t0)			# clobbers t0
>  
> 


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux