Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:47:49PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > On 2 Jan 2003, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > > as the issue about prom.h is still not clear, please aply the
> > > trivial part.
> >
> > > void prom_printf(char *fmt, ...)
> > > {
> > > va_list args;
> > > - char ppbuf[1024];
> > > + char ppbuf[BUFSIZE];
> >
> > What about making ppbuf static, to reduce stack usage?
>
> By the time when prom_printf() is called stack overflow is not really a
> consideration anymore, something fatal has happened before.
I don't think printing e.g. "LINUX started..." indicates something fatal. :-)
Thiemo
