On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:47:49PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On 2 Jan 2003, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > as the issue about prom.h is still not clear, please aply the
> > trivial part.
>
> > void prom_printf(char *fmt, ...)
> > {
> > va_list args;
> > - char ppbuf[1024];
> > + char ppbuf[BUFSIZE];
>
> What about making ppbuf static, to reduce stack usage?
By the time when prom_printf() is called stack overflow is not really a
consideration anymore, something fatal has happened before.
prom_printf() is our own variant of early_print() so eventually should
be replaced by that anyway.
Ralf
