Re: [PATCH]: c-r4k.c, new gcc's don't like empty labels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:19:24PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:

> ralf> On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:43:07AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> patch is trivial to eliminate warnings from the compiler
> 
> ralf> And yet I didn't like it.  The new syntax requirement isn't only ugly code,
> ralf> it's harder to read than a replacing the gotos with a simple return ...
> 
> I thought that the gotos to end was there for generation of code
> reasons.

Doesn't make a code difference in this case for MIPS.

  Ralf


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux