Re: [PATCH]: c-r4k.c, new gcc's don't like empty labels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "ralf" == Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> writes:

ralf> On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:43:07AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> patch is trivial to eliminate warnings from the compiler

ralf> And yet I didn't like it.  The new syntax requirement isn't only ugly code,
ralf> it's harder to read than a replacing the gotos with a simple return ...

I thought that the gotos to end was there for generation of code
reasons.

It is not good in the first place to have labels called out :(

Later, Juan.


-- 
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they 
are different -- Larry McVoy


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux