On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:38:36AM +0100, Kevin D. Kissell wrote: > > Which version of the 4Kc manual are you looking at? I'm looking > at a very recent version of the 4Kc Software User's Manual > (version 1.17, dated September 25, 2002), and it only shows > Hit_Writeback_D to be invalid for *secondary and teritary* > caches, which makes sense, since the 4KSc doesn't have any. > I was looking at rev 1.12, Jan 3, 2001. Good to know that 4K family does have Hit_WRiteback_D. However, since it is "recommanded" instead of "required". Shouldn't we still use "Hit_Writeback_Inv_D" just to be on the safe side? Jun
