On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:17:17PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > This looks suspicious. Haven't you meant "dep_tristate"? Especially as > indydog.c doesn't seem to make any effort to validate it's running on the > system it thinks it is before poking random memory locations. It won't > probably even compile for a non-MIPS kernel. > > BTW, why do people insist on sending patches as attachments -- it makes > commenting them helly twisted, sigh... How true. MIME - broken solution for a broken design ;) More serious, MIME makes sense when using a MUA that garbles patches like Netscape or certain versions of Pine. Ralf (Prolly still be using Mutt + vi in 5 years ...)
