Re: MIPS64 status?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Ralf Baechle wrote:

> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:07:51 -0800
> From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>
> Cc: Matthew Dharm <mdharm@momenco.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
> Subject: Re: MIPS64 status?
> 
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:42:22PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> > I have such hardware myself. IMHO the best option is the mips64 kernel and
> > I hope to try it someday. But in practice I'd guess that Ralf's highmem
> > patch is more likely to be usuable first (?). 
> 
> Depends if you can live with the problems of the current mips64 kernel.
> If you can then it's highmem-free memory managment is certainly the way
> to go.  It's also not limited to peanuts numbers of gigabytes but can
> support as much memory as your can tack on a MIPS.
> 
>   Ralf
> 
Who, if anyone, has a MIPS64 reference design board available ?
...With >4G memory capacity ?


Thanx
Johnh


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux