Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:58:51AM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote: > > > Are you sure this hasn't been fix in the latest sources (2.4.16) ? > > I have send a patch to Ralf, which I believe solves a similar problem as > > you describe below. > > > > Ralf have you applied the patch ? > > Well, I applied it but it's really broken as something can be. Just an > example: > > + /* > + * FPU emulator may have it's own trampoline active just > + * above the user stack, 16-bytes before the next lowest > + * 16 byte boundary. Try to avoid trashing it. > + */ > + sp -= 32; > > So the whole thing needs some overhaul. > You are welcome to find a better way of handling a non-fpu instruction in the delay slot of the fpu-branch instruction. But until someone find a better solution (that works, in all situation), I think we need this patch. > Ralf -- _ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:carstenl@mips.com |\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527 | \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555 TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556 Denmark http://www.mips.com
