On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 04:41:25AM -0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > Are you sure this hasn't been fix in the latest sources (2.4.16) ? > > I have send a patch to Ralf, which I believe solves a similar problem as > > you describe below. > > > > Ralf have you applied the patch ? > > Well, I applied it but it's really broken as something can be. Just an > example: > > + /* > + * FPU emulator may have it's own trampoline active just > + * above the user stack, 16-bytes before the next lowest > + * 16 byte boundary. Try to avoid trashing it. > + */ > + sp -= 32; > > So the whole thing needs some overhaul. Btw, the whole fp trampoline thing will have to die anyway. Virtually indexed i-caches on some new types of SMP are making them even more expensive then they already are. Ralf
