On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Jun Sun wrote: > For compatibility reasons, I assume we still keep sysmips() around > for a while, right? And if that is yes, we better take either flo's or > my fix (derived from Maceij's new syscall) to get rid of the illegal > instruction bug, which really becomes an untolerable FAQ now. I don't think it would be wise to remove MIPS_ATOMIC_SET before 2.5. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
