On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:32:24PM -0700, Jun Sun wrote: > For compatibility reasons, I assume we still keep sysmips() around > for a while, right? And if that is yes, we better take either flo's or > my fix (derived from Maceij's new syscall) to get rid of the illegal > instruction bug, which really becomes an untolerable FAQ now. I've also debugged sysmips. Ralf
