Re: ld.script.in Missing PROVIDE (etext = .);

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Scott A McConnell <samcconn@cotw.com>
Subject: Re: ld.script.in Missing PROVIDE (etext = .);
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:33:55 -0300
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <3AD5BCF9.862FCE33@cotw.com>; from samcconn@cotw.com on Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 07:34:33AM -0700
References: <3AD5BCF9.862FCE33@cotw.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 07:34:33AM -0700, Scott A McConnell wrote:

> Shouldn't there be a :
> 
>  PROVIDE (etext = .);

No.  Why?

  Ralf

References:
- ld.script.in Missing PROVIDE (etext = .);
  - From: Scott A McConnell

Prev by Date: Re: CVS Update@xxxxxxxxxxx: linux
Next by Date: kernel/printk.c problem
Previous by thread: ld.script.in Missing PROVIDE (etext = .);
Next by thread: Dynamic linker and .interp section
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux