On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:58:05PM -0800, Jun Sun wrote:
> a) HAS_FPU & FPU_EMULATION - which is necessary when FPU is not a full
> implementation.
>
> b) !HAS_FPU & FPU_EMULATION - which allows one to run fpu-ful userland
> application
These 2 cases are perfectly good
> c) HAS_FPU & !FPU_EMULATION - when FPU is a full implementaion (or use the
> old incomplete emaulation?)
>
> d) !HAS_FPU & !FPU_EMULATION - it mandates non-fpu-ful userland (which to me
> is perfectly fine)
These 2 cases present a user/developer who decided not to have any
fpu support kernel/cpu wise. Kill his apps if using "illegal" instructions.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912
Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?
