"Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote: > > But the code that needs to know whether there is a real FPU present is > indeed minimal (as it should be) thus the gain from removing the detection > altogether in favour to a config option is at least questionable if not > insane. > Do you like run-time detection better because it allows a kernel to run on CPUs both with a FPU and without a FPU? Or there is something else to it? Another question. I know with mips32 and mips64 we can do run-time detection reliably. What about other existing processors? Jun
