Re: use of HTML in AddressModifyCode

[John Belmonte <jvb@prairienet.org>]

Earl Hood wrote:
> The AddressModifyCode works on the raw data.  As for using
> "." is address obfuscation, it is a very weak form since any
> decent address harvester would expand entity references before
> doing detection.  Why not use something like:
> 
>   <AddressModifyCode>
>   s/\./ dot /g;
>   s/\@/ AT /g;
>   </AddressModifyCode>

I think both entities and dot/at are equally weak against harvesters. 
Entities have the advantage of maintaining address appearance.

-John


-- 
OpenPGP encrypted mail welcome.