On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:22 PM, <Igor.Stoppa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: ext Mark [wolfmane@xxxxxxxxx] > > >> Sigh... I guess potential customers leaving in droves isn't "relevant" >> to you... exactly why Nokia is headed for self-destruction... > > > The only relevant reply that you should - but obviously are phisically unable to - give is on the line of: > > "yes, I am not aware of how things go inside Nokia and it is unfair to blame developers > because i have no ground to assume that they are responsible for all the design decisions" > > Then you can have your rants about Nokia, droves of cheated, unsatisfied, angered customers flocking to Android, iPhone, you name it. > > But that's a different thread. > > igor Except for the not so insignificant detail that the developers (in narrow sense that you mean, as in "software developers") are the ones who say when they have finished their job - when they haven't... Other people may make the decisions as to what features are to be included, but the developers themselves are the ones whose responsibility it is to ensure that 1) all of the specified features are in fact present and accounted for and 2) bugs have been eliminated. And thanks for clearing up the fact that you are the one who is going off on an irrelevant tangent. I only started posting because someone mentioned a "showstopper" and he was blasted for it. Along the way I happened to use the word "developer" meaning anyone connected with developing a finished product - not some specific part of it (and admittedly with too little clarity) and you took offense as a software developer, which is only a small part of the product development picture. Ah, the joys of industry jargon... Mark _______________________________________________ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
