RE: N900 battery duration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is a bug in the cellmo SW related to absence of SIM: the current is higher when the SIM is not in.
So in real life use case (i assume people who will buy it will actually use it as a phone) the use time will be longer.
I would also assume that the sshd makes a difference.
I have no data to back it, but i'm quite sure it has not been profiled for mobile usage.

igor

________________________________________
From: maemo-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [maemo-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Tuomas Kulve [tuomas@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: 25 October 2009 13:45
To: Andrew Flegg
Cc: maemo users
Subject: Re: N900 battery duration

Andrew Flegg wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:34, Tuomas Kulve <tuomas@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This is now run on a 41-10 release without SIM, without WLAN, without
>> charger, with only ogg-support and sshd installed (default widgets on
>> the desktop), and display blanked via the lock button:
>>
>>     C4 |  99.5% | 2297.0ms |
>
> Bet it'll last for *aaaages* :-)

93.75 hours.

I'm not going to repeat that test but based on my other tests, I would
guess that it wouldn't fluctuate more than a few hours.

--
Tuomas
_______________________________________________
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
_______________________________________________
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]    

  Powered by Linux