You could probably watch CPU usage as a pretty good indicator. I've noticed just having some applications in the foreground (like the browser on a complicated webpage) will shoot the CPU usage way up. IIRC, one of the Nokia engineers stated that apps are basically stopped (like hitting Ctrl+Z in bash) when they are minimized, and resumed when they're foregrounded. I might have made this up, but based on the CPU monitor it certainly would appear that something like that is going on. --Paul On 8/16/07, Michael Thompson <michaelnt at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > The battery life of the N800 seems to depend a lot on the applications > that are running, I guess in particular when it is idling. The result of > this is that the battery indicator can be very inaccurate, telling me it > should last for days and it will then die in hours. > > Ideally I'd like this not to be the case but in the interim I'd like to > know which application is causing the problem. When will Nokia expose the > current consumption information, in for instance /proc? Without this > information we cannot determine which application is the culprit much less > set about improving the performance. > > Is there another indirect method that could be used, perhaps the rate of > interrupts for each application? > > Regards, Michael > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-users mailing list > maemo-users at maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-users/attachments/20070816/5ff1991c/attachment.htm