Larry Battraw wrote: > If it doesn't make it into the forthcoming update I am going to be > rather annoyed since this is not rocket science, just paying attention > to a few more bits that identify the card and so forth. I've been > running the SDHC kernel since it was released and had no stability/data > corruption issues. It may not be about SDHC itself. In this case I'd guess the problem is not the kernel but the userspace stuff - i.e. tools to correctly format bigger cards, stuff reporting size that doesn't fit signed long (>2GB) etc. Can be a lot of code to check before you can say you support >=4GB cards. Frantisek
