On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:53 +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 8 May 2013, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > > > > > + unlikely(!atomic_read(&cp->dest->weight)) && > > > > > > We should add '!iph.fragoffs &&' here. > > > > Do we really need that? > > I don't think a SYN can be fragmented. > > SYNs are usually not fragmented. But we don't have the > right to search for SYN in a packet without TCP header. It can > be data fragment that contains 1 at this bit position, when > weight=0 such packets should be forwarded as part of existing > connection. > Shame on me, I should really have thought about that... I think I know who invented the iph.fragoffs :-) Regards Hans > Regards > > -- > Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
